PFFDvsg

Lengthening Reconstruction Surgery

for

Congenital Femoral Deficiency

by Dror Paley, MD, FRCSC



Abstract:

Lengthening for congenital femoral deficiency (CFD) is most applicable in femurs with an intact mobile hip and knee joint irrespective of the amount of discrepancy. Pre-existing knee stiffness is the most functionally limiting factor and should be considered a relative indication for amputation vs. reconstruction. Hip dysplasia or deficiency is reconstructable and is not a limiting factor. Hip reconstruction should be performed prior to lengthening. Knee instability of mild degrees can be protected by stabilizing the tibia during the lengthening. Knee or patellar dislocation should be corrected by a modification of the Langenskiold procedure (for congenital patellar dislocation) prior to lengthening. Delayed ossification of the femoral neck should also ossify prior to lengthening. It may be necessary to perform a valgus osteotomy to eliminate shear in the femoral neck and allow earlier ossification of the proximal femur. Coxa vara can be corrected at the time of lengthening but neck shaft angles less than 90 deg should be corrected prior to lengthening. Pelvic osteotomy to correct hip dysplasia when the center edge angle is less than 20 deg should also be performed prior to lengthening. multiple lengthenings are required for most discrepancies. These should be spaced out as much as possible during childhood. Most lengthenings are completed before high school. The maximum lengthening should not exceed 8-l2cm. in older children and 4-6cm in younger children. Soft tissue releases of the fascia lata, rectus, hamstring and adductor tendons is recommended with each lengthening. Botox injection is another helpful adjunct. Intensive physical therapy to maintain motion of the knee and hip is an essential component of the lengthening treatment. Limiting factors to reconstruction are psycho-socio-economic factors and the lack of experience by the treating orthopedic surgeon. In our experience good or excellent results are obtainable in 91% of children for this condition despite a 70% complication rate with 50% of cases requiring additional surgery to treat complications. Most complications do not lead to permanent sequelae that would worsen the functional result if they are treated aggressively. The results of lengthening for CFD were the same as for traumatic and developmental limb length discrepancy in a group of 70 femoral lengthenings performed by the author.

Introduction:

The congenital femoral deficiency (CFD) is a spectrum of severity of femoral deficiencies and deformities. Deficiency refers to lack of integrity, stability and mobility of the hip and knee joints. Deformity refers to mal-orientation and malrotation and contractures of the hip and knee. Both deficiencies and deformities are present at birth, non progressive and of variable degree.



Classification:

Classifications of congenital short femur and proximal femoral focal deficiency are descriptive but are not helpful in determining treatment. A recent longitudinal follow-up of different classification systems' showed that they were inaccurate in predicting the final femoral morphology based on the initial radiograph. My classification system is based on the factors that influence the lengthening and reconstruction of the congenital short femur.

Congenital Femur Deficiency Classification(Paley) -(fig 1):

Type 1: intact femur with mobile hip and knee
   a) normal ossification proximal femur
   b) delayed ossification proximal femur

Type 2: mobile pseudarthrosis with mobile knee
   a) femoral head mobile in acetabulum
   b) femoral head absent or stiff in acetabulum

Type 3: diaphyseal deficiency of femur
   a) knee motion > 45 degrees
   b) knee motion < 45 degrees


Knee joint mobility/deficiency and not hip joint mobility/deficiency is the most determinant factor for functional outcome and reconstructability of the CFD (e.g.- the degree of hip deficiency does not change following amputation-yet increasing degrees of hip deficiency is used as an indication for amputation and prosthetic fitting). Therefore Types 1 and 2 are the most reconstructable. A wide spectrum of hip and knee dysplasia/deficiency and deformity exists in Type 1 cases. Since this is the type most amenable and most commonly lengthened it is worthy of subclassification according to factors that require correction before the lengthening can be carried out. These factors affect the age at which the lengthening process can begin since multiple corrections will delay the first lengthening. They also affect the number of surgeries that are required prior to starting the lengthening and therefore may affect the decision of reconstruction vs amputation or rotationplasty.


Type 1 Subclassification


0) ready for surgery; no factors to correct before lengthening
1) one factor to correct before lengthening
2) two factors to correct before lengthening
3) three factors to correct before lengthening
4+) etc

(factors requiring correction prior to lengthening of femur: NSA < 90 deg +/- delayed ossification proximal femur, CE angle < 20 deg, subluxing patella and/or dislocating knee)

NSA < 90 deg is corrected by proximal femoral osteotomy (this is also the treatment if there is delayed ossification of the proximal femur); CE angle < 20 deg is corrected by pelvic osteotomy; subluxing patella and/or dislocating knee are corrected by modifications of the Langenskiold procedure (see below).

The strategy of management of all Type 1 cases is to convert Type lb into Type la, and Types la-l, la-2, la-3, etc into la-0. Type la-0 cases can be treated by limb length equalization by one or more lengthenings and/or epiphyseodesis or femoral shortening procedures.

The strategy of management for Type2 cases is to first determine there is either a mobile pseudarthrosis or an absent femoral head. It is important not to mistake Type lb cases for Type 2 and vice versa. In Type 2a cases where there is mobility between the femoral head and the acetabulum and between the femoral shaft and the femoral head, union of the pseudarthrosis is an initial goal of treatment converting Type 2a to Type la. On the other hand Type 2b cases where there is a femoral head with no mobility in the acetabulum cannot be converted to Type lb since the hip is stiff. In Type 2b cases with or without a femoral head a pelvic support hip reconstruction procedure is combined with one of the lengthenings. Until then lengthening can be carried out with extension of the lengthening device to the pelvis. Type '2 cases can be treated by limb length equalization by one or more lengthenings and epiphyseodesis or femoral shortening procedures.

The strategy of management for Type3 cases is to first determine the range of knee joint motion. If the knee has less than 45 deg of motion and the ankle has a good range of motion then a Van Nes rotationplasty with prosthetic fitting should be considered. If the ankle has a poor range of motion in then a Symes amputation combined with prosthetic fitting is the preferred option. Both of these prosthetic reconstruction options can be combined with a pelvic support osteotomy at a latex date. Equalization of limb length by multiple lengthenings is possible but yields the functional outcome of an arthrodesed knee; 'a long run for a short slide'. If there is a significant diaphyseal proximal deficiency but there is more than 45 deg of knee motion present then lengthening can be considered with all efforts made to preserve the knee joint function. The goal of lengthening reconstruction surgery in these cases is to convert the type 3a femur to a type 2b femur. The rest of the reconstruction is as for type 2b. This type of reconstruction while feasible is very complicated and prosthetic reconstruction options may be preferable to minimize the complexity of treatment.


Evaluation of the infant with CFD


The hip:

Based on the clinical exam and the initial radiograph one should try to determine if the femur has a femoral head or a pseudarthrosis. If the femoral head is present without a mobile pseudarthrosis then the femur is considered intact. In the intact femur the neck shaft angle should be evaluated for varus and the acetabulum for dysplasia. If a pseudarthrosis line is present, the pseudarthrosis should be examined fluroscopically to determine if it is mobile or stiff. In a stiff pseudarthrosis the femoral head moves with the rest of the femur. In a mobile pseudarthrosis the femoral head completely or partially doesn't move with the rest of the femur. The unossified femoral neck gives the appearance of a pseudarthrosis. In the infant it is necessary to perform an arthrogram under anesthesia to determine if there is an intact femoral neck or not and whether a pseudarthrosis is stiff or mobile. If the pseudarthrosis is mobile then it is important to establish if the femoral head is at all mobile within the acetabulum. Abduction-adduction, flexion-extension and internal-external rotation movements under image intensification with the dye in the joint will demonstrate if the femoral head moves in the acetabulum. Push-pull stress movements with the dye in the joint will demonstrate if a mobile pseudarthrosis is present. In cases where no motion of the femoral head is appreciated the spinal needle used for arthrography can be inserted. into the femoral head and manipulated from the outside under image intensifier observation. This test may be difficult to assess. The presence of a well developed acetabulum is the best clue that the femoral head is present and probably mobile. MRI and ultrasound may be helpful but are often difficult to interpret in infants with such abnormal anatomy. The arthrogram performed by the orthopedic surgeon remains my preferred testing modality

It is important to examine the range of motion of the hip and identify the presence of fixed adductus, flexion and external rotation of the hip. Fixed flexion deformity of the hip should be compared to the other side in infants before walking age. There is normally some FFD in infant hips for many months after birth. Lack of abduction is a sign of varus deformity of the hip rather that dislocation of the hip. External rotation of the limb is also typical of all grades of CFD.

The knee:

The initial evaluation of the knee is also performed clinically and radiographically. The range of motion of the knee is a critical feature. FFD of the knee is normally present in infant knees. Therefore the affected side should be compared to the normal side. If there is more FFD on the affected side. this is significant. A stiff knee is rarely found except in patients with significant proximal femoral deficiency. In these patients it may be difficult to assess the ROM of the knee because of the short chubby thigh. Examination under anesthesia may be required together with an arthrogram. In stiff knees the plain radiograph may suggest flattening of the posterior half of the femoral condyles as the cause of the FFD. This can be confirmed by arthrogram. The arthrogram may also show a lack of a patello-femoral synovial pouch and an absent patella.

In patients with a mobile knee, the knee should also be evaluated for stability of the tibio-femoral joint and for the presence and tracking of the patella. The stability of the knee in the AP and ML directions should be noted as well as torsional stability. The patella should be palpated and its tracking observed. It may be absent, dislocated, dislocating, subluxing or stable. The tibia may dislocate as it goes into full extension due to tight lateral structures (fascia lata and hamstrings), incompetent capsulo-ligamentous structures and anterior deficiency of the femoral condyles. The knee flexion angle of dislocation/relocation should be noted as well as the direction of rotation of the tibia on the femur with dislocation and reduction.

Treatment plan Type la: ossified proximal femur, hip mobile, knee mobile

As noted above this group is the most reconstructable. Lengthening treatment in these patients should not begin until the neck shaft angle is greater than 90, CE angle > 20, a nonsubluxing patella and nondislocating knee. Each of these prerequisites will be examined separately.

Coxa Vara

If the neck is ossified but the NSA is less than 90 deg then a proximal femoral valgus subtrochanteric osteotomy should be performed prior to lengthening. fly preference is to perform this with external fixation. The hip osteotomy should correct the varus, the bony FFD, and the external rotation deformity. If the hip osteotomy is performed with internal fixation then the hardware needs to be removed before the lengthening. To avoid this additional procedure, reduce the incisional scar of a plating procedure, and to increase the accuracy of correction of a complex valgus, lateral translation, extension and external rotation osteotomy I prefer to use the Ilizarov device to perform the hip osteotomy. External fixation also seems less limited in the amount of correction it can achieve.

For neck shaft angles less than 90 deg especially in infants and young children I prefer to perform the hip osteotomy separate from the lengthening procedure (fig 2). Technically both can be performed at the same time, however, large valgus corrections of the proximal femur apply considerable pressure to the hip joint from the large acute lengthening that occurs. Lengthening of the femur at the same time would add additional pressure to the hip joint. We therefore prefer to separate the two procedures. Smaller degrees of coxa vara stabilize the slightly dysplastic acetabulum and should not be corrected prior to lengthening(fig 3). NSA between 90-110 deg should be considered for correction together with lengthening especially if the CE angle is greater than 25 deg or if the femoral head physis is vertically inclined. (in the latter situation there is a risk of physeal slip or separation during lengthening).


Technique for hip osteotomy: A percutaneous adductor tenotomy is performed first. Two half pins are inserted by the canulated drill technique into the proximal femur while holding the hip maximally adducted and externally rotated(placing the hip in its neutral position). These pins are parallel to the line from the tip of the greater trochanter to the center of the femoral head. Two half pins are inserted into the diaphysis and distal femur using the canulated drill hole technique with the limb in a neutral position. These pins are parallel to the knee joint line and to each other. One Ilizarov arch or segment of a half ring is connected to each pair of pins perpendicular to its sepnent of bone. A percutaneous multiple drill hole osteotomy is performed perpendicular to the femoral diaphysis just distal to the lesser trochanter. The bone is first internally rotated, then laterally translated, then angulated into valgus and tonally extended. The order of correction is critical to maintain bony contact. The arches are fixed to each other using threaded rods with conical washers to hold the correction. If the osteotomy is performed for a delayed ossification of the femoral head a smooth K-wire or small half pin can be inserted across the femoral neck to prevent fracture from the valgus stress of the correction. There will be a fixed abduction contracture at the end of the valgus correction. This will stretch out spontaneously over time.

Acetabular Dysplasia

If the CE angle is less than 20 deg then a pelvic osteotomy should be performed to stabilize the hip before a lengthening procedure (2). If a proximal femoral osteotomy is necessary to correct a severe hip varus, it should be performed at a separate time prior to the pelvic osteotomy. A 3D reconstruction CAT scan of both hips is useful in deciding upon which pelvic osteotomy to perform. If the 3D scan shows good coverage of the affected hip posteriorly and deficiency anterolaterally as compared to the other side then a Salter osteotomy may be performed for coverage. To add some length the Millis-Hall modification of the Salter osteotomy for pelvic lengthening is performed (3)(fig 4). If the 3D scan shows decreased coverage posteriorly due to a hypoplastic posterior lip of the acetabulum then the Salter osteotomy should not be performed since it will decrease the posterior coverage further. In these cases my preference is a Dega osteotomy with shelf augmentation if necessary(fig 5).

Dislocation of Patella or Tibia

Dislocation of the patella or tibia with flexion or extension respectively necessitate a stabilizing procedure prior to lengthening. Isolated instability of the tibia-femoral joint without dislocation does not need to be addressed before lengthening. Isolated subluxation of the patella should also be treated prior to lengthening. I use a modification of the Langenskiold procedure (procedure designed for congenital dislocation of the patella.) to stabilize the knee (4). This procedure may be performed at the same sitting as the pelvic osteotomy since both need to be in a long leg cast postoperatively.

Modified Langenskiold technique: the knee is exposed through a long S shaped incision. The biceps tendon and fascia lata is z lengthened if needed. The capsule is separated from the patella and from the synovium laterally and medially. The synovium is cut from the patella circumferentially. The quadriceps tendon is left attached to the patella proximally and the patellar tendon remains attached to the patella distally. A more medial synovial incision is made for reinsertion of the patella. The synovium is sewn to the patella circumferentially thus centralizing the patella. The synovium is closed laterally where the patella was removed. The patellar tendon is sharply elevated off the apophyseal cartilage and is left connected to periosteum distally. The patella can be moved medially as much as needed pivoting on the distal periosteum. To hold it medial the medial side of the tendon is stitched to medially periosteum in the Grammont technique (5). The capsule is stitched overtop the pateila on the medial side and left open laterally.

To stabilize the tibia on the femur the fascia lata and hamstrings are lengthened. If the tibia is external rotationally unstable to the femur then the distal attachment of the fascia lata is brought anterior to the patella and anchored to the medial epicondyle. This is only applicable for postero-lateral instability of the tibia on the femur(fig 6). After realignment if the vastus lateralis pull is still a deforming lateral force on the patella then its distal tendonous portion can be detached and pulled over top the patella as an additional medial restraint. ) If the dislocation is antero-lateral then we use the fascia lata looped over itself passing under the lateral capsule or the lateral collateral ligament to reattach to Gerdie's tubercle (MacIntosh-lateral substitution-(fig 7) (6). After wound closure the leg is put in a cylinder cast for 6 weeks followed by passive and active motion.

The above problems must all be addressed before beginning the femoral lengthening. Once they are corrected the femur is considered a Type la-0 which is ready for lengthening.


Treatment plan Type lb: delayed ossification proximal femur, hip mobile, knee mobile

The natural history of the intact, unossified femoral neck is probably to eventually ossify. Radiographically the lack of ossification is often interpreted as a pseudarthrosis. Arthrographic examination reveals that the neck and shaft move as one. Whether some of these go on to pseudarthrosis is debatable. The coxa vara associated with these unossified femoral necks probably contributes to the shear forces on the neck that delay its ossification. Therefore the treatment of the delayed ossification of the femoral neck is a valgus proximal femoral osteotomy. This is performed in the manner described above for the ossified proximal femur.

One particular type of delayed ossification is a stiff nonunion line in the inter or subtrochanteric region. There is no movement visible of this nonunion line even with stress and radiographic examination. This type of nonunion is always associated with coxa vara. It can be ignored and the rest of the treatment carried out as for the delayed ossification cases with coxa vara. One alternative treatment I have used in these cases is distraction of the pseudarthrosis to correct deformity and lengthen (fig 11 )

Lengthening of Type 1 CFD

Choice of Osteotomy Level for Lengthening of the Congenital Short Femur:
The level of the lengthening osteotomy is dependent on the technique used; external fixator lengthening or lengthening over a nail (external fixator and nail combined). With external fixation lengthening without a nail the external fixator remains on the limb for the distraction and the consolidation phase. Once the fixator is removed the bone is at risk of fracture through the regenerate or the pin sites. The retained tension in the soft tissues particularly the adductors and the hamstrings increases this risk of fracture. These forces are even greater the more proximal the osteotomy site. The adductors have little effect on distal osteotomy sites but a strong effect on proximal osteotomy sites. The larger the bone cross section the less likely it is to bend or break.. Distal osteotomies have larger cross sectional diameters than proximal osteotomies.

Bone regeneration potential of distal osteotomies is much different than proximal osteotomies in the CSF. The proximal diaphyseal bone is often sclerotic with a narrowed medullary canal. The subtrochanteric bone has a poor ability to regenerate compared to normal proximal femoral bone and compared to the ipsilateral distal femur. There is also a higher incidence of refracture with proximal level osteotomies. Therefore lengthening should be avoided in the proximal femur unless a nail is used at the same time.

Proximal femoral lengthening has less effect on knee ROM. Distal osteotomies have a greater risk of knee stiffness and subluxation. Proximal osteotomies have a greater risk of hip subluxation and tend to go into varus with lengthening..

In addition to these factors one must consider the derotation and varus correction of the femur which are performed proximally and the valgus correction of the knee which is performed distally. If both need to be performed then a proximal osteotomy is performed for derotation and varus, and a distal osteotomy for the valgus and lengthening(fig 3). If the derotation does not need to be performed then only the distal osteotomy is performed for the lengthening and valgus correction. If the femur is completely straight with perhaps only some rotational deformity the osteotomy can be made in the mid-diaphysis which has a wider cross sectional area than the proximal femur and is not the zone of sclerotic poorly healing bone (fig 9).

In older children with a wider medullary canal (greater than 7mm) lengthening over a nail can be performed(fig 9). In LON a proximal osteotomy can be used for lengthening since there is little risk of refracture with a rod in the medullary canal. Intramedullary nailing in children adds the risk of disturbance of growth of the apophysis (7) and avascular necrosis of the femoral head (8). To avoid the latter we use a greater trochanteric starting point and a nail with a proximal bend (e.g. humeral or tibial). To avoid a coxa valga deformity we prefer to use this technique in patients with some coxa vara. The apophyseodesis created by the nail can lead to gradual correction of the coxa vara. Fixator only lengthening is the method we usually use for the first lengthening. LON is usually the method we chose for the second lengthening if the anatomic dimensions and deformities mentioned above permit.

External Rotation Deformity:
Almost every congenital short femur has an external rotation deformity(hip retroversion). This must never be corrected through a distal femoral osteotomy for fear of subluxation of the patella (fig 8). The quadriceps muscle is normally rotated with respect to the knee joint. Therefore if derotation is performed through a distal femoral osteotomy the knee would rotate medially while the patella would be pulled laterally. These patients normally have a hypoplastic patella and a fiat patellar groove on the distal femur. Lateral subluxation or dislocation of the patella would likely occur. If the derotation osteotomy is performed proximally (subtrochanteric) the entire quadriceps mass attached to the shaft of the femur rotates medially decreasing the lateral pull on the patella.

External rotation deformity is corrected at the sarge time as the hip varus deformity. If there is a large coxa vara as discussed above then the derotation is performed at the separate procedure prior to the lengthening. If there is a mild or no coxa vara then the derotation is performed at the time of lengthening as an acute correction through a proximal femoral osteotomy.


Distal Femoral Valgus Deformity:
The distal femur is almost always in valgus. This is due to hypoplasia of the lateral femoral condyle. This is not a growth plate related deformity. Therefore it is nonprogressive. The center of rotation of angulation of this valgus deformity is at the level oi the knee joint line. Therefore any osteotomy to correct the valgus in the supracondylar region needs to angulate into varus and translate laterally in order to avoid creating a secondary translational deformity. The amount of angulation is usually between 5-10 deg. This deformity does not need to be corrected before the lengthening but should be corrected with the lengthening. The fascia lata should be transected or lengthened at the time of correction to help prevent recurrence, increased pressure on the lateral compartment of the knee, knee subluxation during lengthening and loss, of knee motion.

Soft Tissue Releases for Lengthening of the CFD:
Patients with CFD usually have a mild FFD of the hip or a lack of hyperextension of the hip compared to the other side. A positive Ely test may be present. This indicates that the rectus femoris is the etiology of the FFD or lack of HE. FFD may also be present at the knee. Some patients do not have a knee FFD but have an increased popliteal angle compared to the other side. Lack of hip abduction is often present. This may be related to coxa vara and/or to tight hip adductors. Finally the fascia lata can be palpated distally to be thick and tight.

Soft tissue releases are essential in conjunction with the lengthening to prevent subluxation and stiffness of knee and hip. In the CFD we always release the rectus femoris tendon at its origin, and the fascia lata. The rectus tendon is cut through a 3 cm oblique incision. It is exposed in the interval between the sartorius and the tensor fascia lata. Care is taken not to injure the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. The distal fascia lata is cut through a longitudinal incision at the level of the proximal pole of the patella. The incision is located over the intermuscular septum so that the lateral hamstring can also be exposed. The fascia lata is cut transversely from its anterior thickening to the intermuscular septum. The septum is also transected. The posterior extension of the fascia lata is also transected. Through the same incision the lateral hamstring muscle is exposed. The tendonous portion of the muscle is cut leaving the underlying muscle in continuity. If there is a popliteal angle over 10 then a separate incision is made to fractionally lengthen the semimembranosis, and gracilis tendons. The semitendinosis tendon is transected. Through the fascia lata incision the anterior fascia of the thigh which is the anterior extension of the fascia lata is also transected. The adductor muscles are also released. For distal femoral lengthenings a percutaneous release is sufficient. For proximal femoral lengthenings we prefer an open more extensive adductor release.

Instead or as an adjunct to soft tissue release we have recently started to use Botulinum toxin to temporarily weaken or paralyze some of the hamstrings and adductors and even the rectus femoris. This is injected at the time of surgery, at a dose of 5 units/ kg total body dose, with between 30-50 units into each muscle head. Its effect should wear off in 3-6 months. Botox seems to reduce muscle spasm and pain in these patients.

Finally the timing of soft tissue release may be an important factor. I usually perform the release at the time of application of fixator and lengthening osteotomy. The problem with this is that the soft tissues are not under tension. They therefore heal up during the lengthening and retether the femur. Recently I noticed that in a few cases where the soft tissue release was performed as a planned second stage procedure (4-6 weeks after the lengthening began), I was able to achieve greater lengthening because the knee motion was better maintained for longer. Delayed soft tissue release cuts the soft tissues when they are under tension and prevents them from joining up before the distraction is over.

Knee instability consideration:
Almost all CSF can be assumed to have hypoplastic or absent cruciate ligaments with mild to moderate AP instability. Some also have ML and torsional instability. Despite this the knee tracks normally preoperatively and there is no indication to do a ligamentous reconstruction in most cases. The significance of the knee instability to lengthening is the tendency to subluxation of the knee with lengthening. Knee subluxation with lengthening is usually posterior, or posterior plus external rotation but can also be anterior. Posterior subluxation can only occur with knee flexion. Therefore to prevent posterior subluxation some people recommend splinting the knee in extension thoughout the distraction phase (9). This promotes knees stiffness while protecting the knee from subluxation. The preferable way to protect the knee is to extend the fixation to the tibia with hinges. The hinges permit knee motion while preventing posterior as well as anterior subluxation. For this reason we prefer to use a fixator that allows hinging across the knee joint. This is easily performed with the Ilizarov circular (fig 10a) fixator but not as readily with the monolateral fixators (fig 10b).

A less common knee instability is anterior dislocation of the tibia on the femur. This type of dislocation occurs as the knee goes into extension. It is important to document at which angle of flexion the knee relocates (conversely at which angle short of full extension the knee dislocates. The dislocation is due to an anterior deficiency of the distal femur (the lateral radiograph of the knee shows a lack of the anterior protuberance of the femoral condyles). One treatment of this instability is extension osteotomy of the knee. The distal femur is extended by the number of degrees of flexion required to relocate the knee. I have found the modified Langenskiold procedure better than extension osteotomy in these instances. Knee extension osteotomy leads to loss of knee flexion.


(Distal Femoral Lengthening Technique: The soft tissue releases are performed first. Two Ilizarov rings properly sized for the distal femur are applied to a distal femoral reference wire. The angle between the rings is equal to the valgus deformity. The rings are connected by juxta-articular hinges that are distal to the lower ring. A half pin is connected to the proximal ring. at the level of the distal third of the femur. Two additional half pins are inserted at the lesser trochanteric level and fixed to an arch which is fixed to the proximal ring. Two half pins are inserted posteromedial and posterolateral at the level of the distal metaphysis and fixed to the distal ring. The one wire can be removed. Hinges are attached to the distal femoral ring after identifying the level of the center of rotation of the knee joint using the image intensifier. the center of rotation of the knee is located at the virtual intersection of the posterior femoral cortical line and the distal femoral physeal line (10). Two tibial half pins are inserted and fixed onto a half ring. This is connected to the hinges. At least a 90 deg range of knee motion should be possible with the hinge.

The distal femoral osteotomy is performed percutaneously with multiple drill holes and an osteotome. If a simultaneous derotation and mild coxa vara correction are also planned then a proximal osteotomy for correction of deformity along with the distal lengthening osteotomy is needed. Two half pins are used at each of the three levels of bone. )


Rehabilitation and Follow-up during lengthening:

Femoral lengthening requires close follow-up and intensive rehabilitation in order to identify problems and maintain a functional extremity respectively. Follow-up is usually every 2 weeks for radiographic and clinical assessment. Clinically the patient is assessed for hip and knee range of motion, knee subluxation, nerve function, and pin sites. Radiographically the distraction gap length, regenerate bone quality, limb alignment, and joint location are assessed.

Knee flexion should be maintained at greater than 45 deg. If knee flexion is 40 deg or less then the lengthening should be stopped and the knee rehabilitated more. If after a few days the knee flexion greater than 45 deg is regained, lengthening may resume. Remember never sacrifice function for length. We can always add more length at an additional lengthening but we cannot recreate a knee joint. Knee extension should also be monitored. Maximal extension is usually present following surgery. A flexion contracture may develop during lengthening. To prevent this a knee extension bar may be used at night and for one or two hours during the day. A fixed flexion deformity of the knee places it at risk of posterior subluxation. Subluxation of the knee can be suspected clinically based on a change in shape of the front of the tibia relative to the kneecap. Posterior subluxation of the tibia presents with a very prominent knee cap and a depression of the tibia relative to the kneecap (skihill sign). Extension of the external fixation across the knee with hinges prophylaxes against posterior subluxation (11).

Hip motion may become more limited with lengthening. Adduction and flexion contractures are the most significant since they lead to hip subluxation and dislocation. Rerelease of the adductors and the rectus, sartorius and the tensor fascia lata during lengthening may need to be considered in order to allow continued lengthening.).

The deep peroneal nerve is the nerve at greatest risk with femoral lengtheaing. Referred pain to the anterior distal leg or dorsum of the foot should be considered peroneal nerve related until proven otherwise. Hyper or hypoesthesia in the distribution of the peroneal nerve or weakness of the extensor hallucis longus muscle are corroborative evidence of nerve entrapment. A nerve conduction study (our preference is near nerve conduction using very fine needle technique at the level of the fibular neck) may show evidence of nerve injury. Finally quantitative sensory testing if available is the most sensitive test to assess for nerve involvement. With quantitative sensory evidence and sensory signs only the distraction is slowed to see if the referred pain goes away. If the referred pain does not dissipate or if motor signs or positive nerve conduction evidence of nerve injury are present, a nerve decompression at the neck of the fibula is carried out. Lengthening may continue after the decompression at 3/4 or 1/2 mm/ day.

Hypotrophic regenerate formation requires slowing down the distraction rate Overabundant bone formation that may lead to premature consolidation requires speeding up the distraction rate for few days. A mismatch between the increase in the distraction gap from one visit to the next and the number of millimeters of distraction carried out during the same time period is a sign of an impending premature consolidation. Radiographs are also used to assess joint location. A break in Shenton's line or increased medial-lateral head-teardrop distance indicates subluxation of the hip. In the knee posterior or anterior subluxation can be monitored on the lateral full knee extension radiograph". Limb length equalization should be based on full length standing radiographs. If there is a knee flexion deformity a scanogram with the knees equally flexed and the hip, knee and ankle equally positioned to the radiographic plate is used instead. Limb alignment is assessed for femur and tibia separately and in combination. Separately the joint orientation of the knee should be measured using the Malalignment Test (12). Axial deviation from lengthening (procurvatum and valgus for distal femoral lengthening and procurvatum and varus for proximal lengthening) is identified and corrected at the end of the distraction phase when the regenerate bone is still malleable.

When there is malalignment of the femur and tibia, the femoral malalignment is corrected to a normal distal femoral joint orientation. The femur is not over or under corrected to compensate for the tibial deformity. The tibia should be corrected separately either during the same or at a later treatment.

Physical therapy(PT) starts within one or two days from surgery. PT should continue daily throughout the distraction and consolidation phase. It stops briefly after removal of the external fixator to avoid a fracture through the regenerate or a pin hole. Once the bone is strong enough it continues. During the distraction phase one to two formal sessions each day(45-60 minutes each) with a therapist are required. In addition at least 2 home sessions per day (30 minutes each) are recommended. The more therapy the better the potential functional result and the faster the rehabilitation following removal. Inpatient rehabilitation is often the only practical method of achieving this quantity of therapy. The philosophy of therapy for lengthening is very different than for other orthopedic surgical procedures. Following most orthopedic procedures the patient is at their worst after surgery and gradually recovers. One week following surgery lengthening patients are at their best. Thereafter due to the distraction, the muscles become tighter and range of motion of joints more limited. It is not until the consolidation phase that the usual pattern of rehabilitation and recovery occurs. One can think of the lengthening surgery ending at the end of the distraction phase: a surgical procedure that can be measured in months rather than hours. In the absence of .a therapy program we will not even consider femoral lengthening.

The majority of the therapy time should be spent obtaining knee flexion and maintaining knee extension. Passive exercises are the most important during the distraction phase and passive plus active exercises during the consolidation phase. Hip abduction and extension are the two important hip exercises. Strengthening exercises should be focused on the hip abductors and the quadriceps. Electric muscle stimulation is used on the quadriceps. Upper extremity strengthening is helpful for use of walking aids and transfers. Weight bearing is encouraged and allowed as tolerated.


Treatment Type 2a: mobile pseudarthrosis, mobile femoral head in acetabulum, knee mobile

The goal of treatment in this group is to convert the femur into a Type 1. This requires obtaining union of the pseudarthrosis. Even if failure to obtain union occurs with the first treatment the pseudarthrosis may be converted to a stiffer type which can then be treated more easily. To classify this group into Type 2a it is necessary to do a fluroscopic examination. In the infant when the ossific nucleus is separated from the rest of the femur by a large gap of lack of ossification an arthrogram is necessary to demonstrate differential motion of the head and femur demonstrating a mobile nonunion and mobile head (fig 12).

In order to obtain union of the head to the femur it is necessary to open the pseudarthrosis, bone graft it and reorient it. A proximal femur valgus osteotomy is performed to reorient the nonunion and the coxa vara. The valgus can be performed either like that of a neck or more like a Schanz pelvic support osteotomy under the head. If the femur is proximally migrated it may be necessary to pull down the femur relative to the pelvis as a first stage. If this is not possible acutely then it should be done gradually. It is important to extend the fixation to the pelvis in order to neutralize the forces at the pseudarthrosis site (fig 13). Once the pseudarthrosis is united the rest of the treatment is as per Type l.


Treatment Type 2b: mobile pseudarthrosis or absent proximal femur, femoral head stiff or absent in acetabulum, knee mobile

If the hip is determined to be stiff or absent but the knee is mobile, reconstruction can still be performed combined with lengthening. Motion of the hip in these patients comes from the mobile pseudarthrosis. The proximal femoral shaft should not be fixed to the femoral head. If union of the femoral shaft is carried out to the femoral head the hip will be stiff. To preserve hip motion but create stability for lengthening and for gait the proximal femur should be osteotomized into valgus under the femoral head. This type of hip reconstruction is not performed until age 10-16 yrs.

Prior to this age the femur can be lengthened once or twice. Frequently the femur is so short that it cannot be lengthened together with hinging of the knee. In these cases the knee can be locked in extension for the first lengthening. Either femoral lengthening alone or simultaneous femur and tibial lengthening may be performed.. Fixation must extend to the pelvis to prevent proximal migration of the femur (fig 14).

If the femur is large enough then hinging of the knee is performed. This may wait until the second lengthening. At later childhood or early adolescence the hip reconstruction osteotomy may be performed in combination with lengthening and realignment.

If there is a major deficiency of the proximal femoral diaphysis then the first lengthening is performed to grow the femoral shaft. Obviously the more deficient the proximal femur the more complicated the lengthening program becomes. The risk of significantly losing knee motion in this group is very high. Knee flexion deformity is very common in this group. An arthrogram should be done to determine if the femoral condyles are round. If the femoral condyles are round the knee can be extended by soft tissue releases and distraction. If the femoral condyles are flat the knee should be extended by osteotomy.

Obviously as the degree of deficiency increases the appeal of a prosthetic option of treatment increases. This will be addressed later


Treatment Type 3a: Diaphyseal Deficiency, knee ROM > 45 degrees

Deficiency of the proximal femur with an absent femoral head, greater trochanter and proximal femoral metaphysis has a mobile pseudarthrosis and a very short femoral remnant. Despite this some cases have a mobile knee with greater than 45 of motion and frequently as much as 90 of motion. There is usually a knee flexion deformity of about 45 present. The treatment option in these cases should include lengthening or prosthetic reconstruction ( Van Nes or Symes). The latter is certainly less taxing on the patient and family while the former requires significant lengthening surgery expertise and multiple surgeries throughout childhood. To lengthen Type 3a femur deficiency the femur should be converted to a type 2b. After that treatment is as described above for Type 2b. The knee flexion deformity in these cases can be addressed in one of 2 ways. If there is flattening of the articular surface of the distal femur then the correction of the flexion deformity can be performed by extension osteotomy of the distal femur. If the condyles appear round on arthrogram then the knee flexion deformity can be corrected by extension osteotomy of the distal femur combined with lengthening through the same osteotomy. Because of the severe discrepancy from this type of deficiency, a combined femur and tibia lengthening can be carried out. Since the femur is so short it is impossible to lengthen and allow knee motion at the same time. The frame is therefore extended across the knee joint without hinges. The fixator is also extended across the hip to the pelvis to prevent proximal migration of the femur.


Treatment Type 3a: Diaphyseal Deficiency, knee ROM < 45 degrees

Lack of motion of the knee to < 45 deg is due to malformation of the lower end of the femur and abnormalities and deficiencies of some of the soft tissues.. The femoral condyles are flat and the tibia articulates in flexion with the squared off end of the femur. There is an absence of the suprapatellar pouch. The quadriceps muscle and tendon are usually present ( they may be absent) although the patella is usually absent. Complete rigidity of the knee is frequently related to an abnormal ligament running from the insertion site of the anterior cruciate to the anterior surface of the distal femoral condyles. Once this ligament is resected the knee can flex. Resection of this ligament frequently results in 45 deg of knee flexion. Since the femur is so short it is very difficult to exercise the knee since there is no proximal lever to stabilize. The best result that can be hoped for in these limbs with a lengthening program is equalization of limb length, a mobile hip, a mobile ankle and a stiff knee with at the most 45 deg of motion. Functionally this is probably not as good as a Van Ness rotationplasty which offers active motion of the knee. In comparison to a Symes with an above knee prosthesis the difference is probably the convenience of a passively mobile knee with the prosthesis compared to the advantages of foot sensation without the need for a prosthesis following lengthening. In the Van Nes and the Symes the hip is deficient and unstable.; Ilizarov hip reconstruction to minimize limp and give better pelvic support can be considered following Symes and Van Nes. A lengthening program for Type 3b is a very long haul requiring multiple procedures to achieve limb length equality. It should only be considered in patients that absolutely refuse one of the prosthetic options (fig 15), have bilateral disease or phocomelia affecting the upper extremities.


Age Strategies:

The majority of Type 1 CFD require at least 2 lengthenings, As the expected discrepancy at skeletal maturity increases the number of lengthenings required to equalize LLD increases. The amount of lengthening that can be performed in the femur at any one time is dependent on the initial length of the femur. Generally 4-6cm can be performed safely in toddler (age 2-4) femurs. In children over age 6 at least 6-8cm is usually possible. In adolescents and young adults 8-12cm may be possible in the femur. Combined femur and tibia lengthenings allow greater lengthening amounts. Tibial lengthening of up to 5cm can be combined with the above femoral lengthening amounts. Toddler lengthening should only be considered in children with a well developed hip joint including an ossified femoral neck. Toddler lengthening is usually limited to 4-6cm although we have safely performed up to 8cm in the older toddlers if knee motion is well maintained. The two main advantages of toddler lengthening are growth stimulation and reduction of prosthetic needs. Growth stimulation was seen consistently in our toddler femoral lengthenings. It is a progressive stimulation in some cases while in others it returns to the previous growth rate. With a reduction of the leg length difference toddlers are able to reduce one level of prosthetic limb length equalization. This means going from a long leg prosthesis to an AFO and shoe lift, AFO and shoe lift to shoe lift only or shoe lift to no lift. The complication rate in this group is no higher than in older children.


Discrepancy at maturity:
<6 cm:               1 lengthening over age 6
7-12cm: 2 lengthenings: toddler(<5cm) + age 8-10(<8cm)
1 lengthening: toddler(<5cm) or age 6(<8cm) +epiphyseodesis(<5cm)
12-16 2 lengthenings: toddler(<5cm) or age 6-8 (6-8cm) + age 10-12 (8-10cm)
16-20cm '2 lengthenings: toddler(<5cm) or age 6-8 (<8cm) + age 10-1'2 (8-10cm)
+tibia (<5cm)during one of the femoral lengthenings
3 lengthenings: toddler(<5cm) + age 8-10 (6-8cm)
+ age 10-14 (8-10cm)
2 lengthenings: toddler(<5cm) or age 6-8 (<8cm) + age 10-12 (8-10cm)
+epiphyseodeisis(<5cm)
21-25cm 3 lengthenings: toddler(<5cm) + age 8-10 (6-8cm)
+ age 12-16 (10-12cm)
3 lengthenings: age 6-8 (<8cm) + age 10-12 (8-10cm) +age 12-16(8-12cm)
+tibia (<5cm)during one of the femoral lengthenings
2 lengthenings: age 6-8(<Scm) + age 10-12 (8-10cm) +tibial lengthening
+tibial lengthening(<lcm) with one of the femoral lengthening
+epiphyseodesis(<5cm)
>25cm 3 lengthenings + epiphyseodesis
4 lengthenings

The above are some strategy formulations combining the amount of lengthening possible (safe) at different ages with additional lengthening in the tibia and/or contralateral epiphyseodesis of the femur. There are more possible strategic combinations than those listed. The strategy must allow time for the additional procedures required to correct deformities and instabilities of the hip and knee.


Lengthening Reconstruction Surgery vs Prosthetic Replacement Surgery

Strategies and methods of lengthening reconstruction surgery(LRS) at our center is described above. Prosthetic replacement surgery(PRS) refers to Symes amputation and Van Ness Rotationplasty followed by prosthetic fitting. The latter two PRS have been used almost indiscriminately for all types of CFD. The reason for this dates back to the disastrous experience with the Wagner technique for LRS of these femurs (13). Many patients were worse off after the reconstruction than if surgery had never been performed (treatment worse than the disease). In our experience with the above strategies in children and adults not a single patient thus far falls into that category. We have not compared our LRS results with PRS results since we do not have a comparable cohort. Nevertheless our results in 54 patients with congenital short femur syndrome are: Type la (45 patients) Excellent-32, Good-10, Fair-3 and Poor-0 (result score is based on clinical subjective, clinical objective and radiographic criteria); Type lb (2 patients) Good- 1, Fair-1; Type 2a (1 patient) Good-1; Type 2b (3 patients) Excellent-l, Good - 1, Fair-1; Type 3a (1 patient Good -1; Type 3b (2 patients) Good-2. Many of these patients have completed only one lengthening while others have completed as many as three lengthenings. In a separate study of 70 Ilizarov femoral lengthenings clinical and radiographic results were compared between congenital, post-traumatic and developmental cases undergoing lengthening. There was no significant difference in results based on etiology.

While more authors are recommending LRS, pseudarthrosis and the status of the hip is used as a primary deciding factor for LRS vs PRS. It should be emphasized that the hip status does not change after PRS. We argue therefore that the status of the hip should not be a major deciding factor for PRS or not. In fact hip procedures used for LRS are useful to stabilize the hip and improve gait even if PRS is chosen. The status of the knee for us is the deciding factor to recommend LRS vs PRS. Therefore our absolute indications for PRS are primarily in Type 3 cases. In Type 2 cases it should also be considered depending on how good the knee is and how much predicted discrepancy there is. Type la&b should rarely be considered for PRS, unless there is a stiff knee associated with these types. Finally in Type 1 CFD, LRS is so reliable in our hands that PRS should only be considered when psychologic or socio-economic reasons prevail.

One of the arguments for PRS is the contention that LRS leads to psychologic scarring and loss of childhood. In our experience LRS if properly conducted with an appropriate rehabilitation program and surgeries strategically spaced apart does not lead to obvious psychological scarring to the child. In fact my experience (having written several letters of recommendation to college for these children) is that most children develop stronger characters and a more goal oriented approach to life. It can truly be a growing experience. LRS is an investment. The child invests part of their childhood in order to live the majority of their life as an adult with as near normal an extremity as possible. We try to complete the LRS before the child enters high school whenever possible so that the formative years of body image at the time when the children are most self conscious are with both limbs of equal length and near normal function. In this manner most go through a normal adolescence. The psychological stress of wearing a prosthesis during adolescence is not well quantified by psychological profiles performed on these individuals as adults. Therefore it is difficult to compare LRS vs PRS.

Psych-socio-economic stresses can play a major role in the decision LRS vs PRS. Single parents, marital difficulties, financial difficulties, drug problems, behavioral problems, learning disabilities and mental capacity, etceteras may interfere in the compliance, maturity, and home stability required to undergo LRS. PRS is easier, more painless and requires far less of the family. In such situations where the family would find it difficult to comply, or too stressful for the other family members PRS is the preferable option. Distance may play a factor too. If the patient is unable to commute to a center that can provide successful LRS then PRS may be a preferable option. This also applies to the postoperative rehabilitation required which is an absolute prerequisite. This problem may be soluble by rehabilitation hospitals and free care hospitals for children. Finally successful LRS requires a team dedicated to this type of treatment. It is not a procedure that should be performed casually or by surgeons inexperienced in the treatment of these patients. Experience in limb lengthening for other conditions is not sufficient to know how to successfully lengthen children with CFD. It requires a long commitment of time on the surgeonís part and on the part of the surgeons team. It requires appropriate rehabilitation services. If all of these facilities are not available then LRS should not be considered at that venue. The latter is perhaps the main limiting factor today in the availability of LRS.


Note from PFFDvsg Webmaster:  For more information contact:

The International Center for Limb Lengthening
Sinai Hospital of Baltimore
2411 West Belvedere Avenue
Baltimore, Maryland 21215   USA
410-601-8700   800-221-8425
fax: 410-601-9576


[Home] [PFFD Info] [PFFDvsg Virtual Support Group] [Send comments]